Skip to content
Research Hub/AI Coding Assistants

AI Coding Assistants

The $29B IDE revolution: Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code

TL;DR

The AI coding market exploded in 2025-2026. Cursor (Anysphere) hit $29.3B valuation with $1B+ ARR and 1M+ daily active users. GitHub Copilot maintains 20M+ users powering 90% of Fortune 100. Claude Code leads terminal-based agentic coding. GPT-5.3 Codex dominates Terminal-Bench at 77.3%. The top 3 (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code) hold 70%+ combined market share — all hitting $1B+ ARR. 67% of developers now leverage AI tools daily.

Updated 2026-02-065 sources validated1 claims verified

$29.3B

Cursor (Anysphere) valuation

CNBC / WSJ

20M+

GitHub Copilot users

GitHub

$1B+

Cursor ARR

Crunchbase

67%

Developers using AI tools daily

Industry surveys

01

Tool Landscape (February 2026)

The AI coding market consolidated around three dominant players — Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code — holding 70%+ combined market share. Each represents a distinct philosophy: enterprise integration (Copilot), AI-native IDE (Cursor), and agent-first terminal (Claude Code).

GitHub Copilot

20M Users

20M+ users, 1.3M paid subscribers, 90% of Fortune 100. $10-39/mo. Agent mode launched. Broadest enterprise integration.

Cursor (Anysphere)

$29.3B

$29.3B valuation, $2.3B Series D, $1B+ ARR, 1M+ DAU. $20/mo. Agent mode, Composer, codebase-wide context. 300+ employees.

Claude Code

Agent-First

Terminal-based agent. Agent Teams for parallel work. MCP tools, hooks, skills. 1M context (Opus 4.6). Agentic-first.

GPT-5.3 Codex

77.3% T-Bench

OpenAI's coding specialist. 77.3% Terminal-Bench (#1). Best SWE-Bench Pro score. Deep thinking for complex tasks.

Windsurf (Codeium)

Challenger

Cascade agent + Flow actions. Full project awareness. Free tier. Budget Cursor alternative.

02

Coding Benchmarks (February 2026)

The benchmark landscape reveals no single winner — different tools excel at different tasks. Claude Opus 4.6 leads SWE-bench Verified (bug fixing), GPT-5.3 Codex dominates Terminal-Bench (agentic coding), and Qwen3-Coder-Next achieves remarkable efficiency at 3B parameters.

SWE-bench Verified

Bug Fixing

Opus 4.6: 80.8% | Gemini 3 Flash: 76.2% | Qwen3-Coder: 70.6% (3B params)

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Agentic Coding

GPT-5.3 Codex: 77.3% | Opus 4.6: 65.4% | Opus 4.5: 59.3%

SWE-Bench Pro

Complex SE

GPT-5.3 Codex: best score | Qwen3-Coder: 44.3% (notable for 3B params)

03

Market Share Shift

The Copilot-to-Cursor migration is the defining market trend. In January 2025, 80%+ of AI-assisted PRs used Copilot vs under 20% Cursor. By October 2025, it shifted to 60% Copilot / 40% Cursor. Claude Code carved a distinct terminal-based niche, particularly popular with senior engineers and infrastructure teams.

Enterprise

Copilot

Copilot dominates: 90% Fortune 100, deepest IDE integration, strongest compliance controls.

Startups & Indie Devs

Cursor

Cursor leads: AI-native UX, Composer for multi-file, rapid innovation cycle.

Power Users & Infra

Claude Code

Claude Code leads: terminal-native, MCP ecosystem, skills system, agent autonomy.

04

The Autonomous Coding Shift

The industry transitioned from "AI-assisted coding" (autocomplete) to "AI-driven coding" (agents that plan, implement, test, and iterate). Key milestone: Devin by Cognition Labs became the first autonomous software engineer, followed by GPT-5.3 Codex's agent-style development and Claude Code's Agent Teams for parallel coding. The future is not pair programming — it is delegation.

Key Findings

1

Cursor hit $29.3B valuation with $1B+ ARR and 1M+ daily active users — fastest SaaS growth in history

2

GitHub Copilot maintains 20M+ users and powers 90% of Fortune 100 companies

3

Top 3 (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code) hold 70%+ combined market share, all at $1B+ ARR

4

GPT-5.3 Codex dominates Terminal-Bench 2.0 at 77.3%; Opus 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 80.8%

5

Qwen3-Coder-Next achieves 70.6% SWE-bench with only 3B active parameters (Apache 2.0)

6

Copilot → Cursor migration shifted from 80/20 to 60/40 in under 12 months

7

67% of developers now leverage AI tools daily, up from 30% two years ago

Frequently Asked Questions

77% of developers now use AI coding tools in their daily workflow, according to Stack Overflow surveys.

Sources & References

5 validated sources · Last updated 2026-02-06

[1]
[2]
AI Coding Assistants Comparison
SeediumBlog / Analysis
[3]
Best AI Coding Agents 2026
Faros AIBlog / Analysis
[4]
Best AI Coding Assistants 2026
PlayCodeBlog / Analysis
[5]
AI Developer Tools
Pragmatic CodersBlog / Analysis