01 / The complete workflow
From search data to a reviewed website change
Choose a page, collect the evidence, brief your assistant and check what it produces.
Search and website practice
Use search evidence to decide what to improve, then give your AI assistant a brief you can inspect. Start with one page and carry its sources through to the finished change.
Read the workflowGuides and blank working templates. No paid account is needed to prepare a brief.
Choose your task
01 / The complete workflow
Choose a page, collect the evidence, brief your assistant and check what it produces.
02 / Data access
Check access, discover reports and preserve the result. Documentation reviewed; paid-account execution is untested.
03 / Measurement
Keep mentions, citations, recommendations and referrals distinguishable.
04 / Content relationships
Use a content graph when it improves retrieval and maintenance decisions.
Use the first-party reports available for your website. Record the period and missing coverage before interpreting a trend.
Evaluate Semrush or DataForSEO for a bounded research task. Keep provider estimates distinct from your own site's results.
Use Firecrawl, a specified Apify Actor or a self-hosted crawler to inspect pages. Extraction alone cannot tell you search demand.
These are editorial options. Links in this hub do not establish a partner relationship, account access or a tested comparison. See the affiliate policy for monetized recommendations elsewhere.
Free working files
Download the blank files directly. They contain no measured results, account keys or hidden installation steps.
Reader, evidence, permissions and acceptance in one editable file.
content-brief.md
A blank record that keeps missing values explicitly unknown.
evidence-record.json
A spreadsheet-ready header for your own observations.
measurement-log.csv
Define the comparison, observation window and stop rule.
experiment-protocol.md
Your website
Prepare a brief from the evidence you already have. This form runs in your browser and does not send field values to a server. Clear the form when you finish.
Use these protocols to test your own workflow. They are proposed comparisons; this page reports no winning tool or search uplift.
Give both arms the same task, model and time allowance. Change only the evidence access. Review source support, accepted output, cost and human correction time. Record failures as well as successes.
Freeze a permitted URL set and manually label the required fields. Compare accuracy, missing fields, retries, runtime cost and maintenance effort. Hold the demand-data source constant.