Skip to content
FrankX.AI

Head-to-head · 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

Verdict. Opus 4.6 for reasoning and long-context depth; GPT-5.2 Pro for native voice and the broadest multimodal footprint. Note: both are superseded — Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 are the current flagships; see Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5.

Claude Opus 4.6GPT-5.2 Pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Released2026-02-052026-01-01
Context1M196K
Max output128K
Input /1M$5.00$21.00
Output /1M$25.00$168.00
Modalitiestext, vision, codetext, vision, audio

The analysis

Claude Opus 4.6 led the reasoning benchmarks that matter for hard agentic work — 68.8% ARC-AGI-2 (vs 54.2%), 72.7% OSWorld, 90.2% BigLaw Bench — plus a 1M-token beta context and the Compaction API for effectively unbounded sessions.

GPT-5.2 Pro answered with breadth: native audio modality, strong general multimodal performance, the first 90% ARC-AGI-1, and the widest enterprise integration ecosystem. For voice-native products there was no close runner-up.

Currency note: this matchup is preserved for reference. Opus 4.6 has been superseded by Opus 4.8 (May 2026) and GPT-5.2 Pro by GPT-5.5 (April 2026). For a current decision, see Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5.

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if…

  • Hard reasoning, computer-use, or legal/technical depth
  • Long-context research synthesis (1M beta)
  • Parallel agent orchestration

Pick GPT-5.2 Pro if…

  • Native voice / audio is core to your product
  • You need the broadest multimodal coverage
  • You are standardized on the OpenAI ecosystem

Claude Opus 4.6

Previous reasoning + long-context flagship — superseded by Opus 4.8.

GPT-5.2 Pro

Previous OpenAI flagship — superseded by GPT-5.5.

More comparisons